Cambodia passes adultery law, opposition walks out reuters creating your dating site username
Both “Reaction” and “Progressivism” are vast umbrella concepts on whose definition no one can agree.Both combine many very diverse ideas, and sometimes exactly who falls on what side will be exactly the point at issue.This document needs extensive revision to stay fair and correct, but such revision is currently lower priority than other major projects.Until then, I apologize for any inaccuracies or misrepresentations.] This is the Anti-Reactionary FAQ.In general, this FAQ chooses two Reactionary bloggers as its foils – Mencius Moldbug of Unqualified Reservations, and Michael Anissimov of More Right.
In particular the difference between feudal monarchies and divine-right-of-kings monarchies seems to be sort of lost on many of them.Neoreaction is a political ideology supporting a return to traditional ideas of government and society, especially traditional monarchy and an ethno-nationalist state.It sees itself opposed to modern ideas like democracy, human rights, multiculturalism, and secularism.Progressivism is supposed to be a worldwide movement, stronger than the vagaries of local politics.I will not require complete concordance between all Western countries, but if the Anglosphere countries, France, Germany, and Japan seem split about fifty-fifty between growth and decay in a certain indicator, blaming Progressivism isn’t going to cut it.
I tried to give a more complete summary of its beliefs in Reactionary Philosophy In An Enormous, Planet Sized Nutshell.